Unequal Democracy the Political Economy of the New Gilded Age Review

• Dwelling
• My Books

Open Preview

See a Trouble?

We'd love your help. Let us know what's incorrect with this preview of Unequal Democracy by Larry M. Bartels.

Thanks for telling us nearly the problem.

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

 · 425 ratings  · 37 reviews

Showtime your review of Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Golden Historic period

Sep 19, 2017 Rob rated information technology really liked it

Read the 2nd edition which came out in 2016. A highly sophisticated case of political science research that clearly demonstrates that the economy does meliorate during Democratic administrations, the wealthy benefit profoundly during Republican administrations, and that government primarily ignores the poor, barely pays attention to the center class, while catering significantly to the interests of the wealthy. Our political system is an example of what Aristotle meant past an oligarchy. As Bartels n Read the 2d edition which came out in 2016. A highly sophisticated case of political science enquiry that clearly demonstrates that the economic system does better during Autonomous administrations, the wealthy do good greatly during Republican administrations, and that government primarily ignores the poor, barely pays attention to the middle class, while catering significantly to the interests of the wealthy. Our political system is an example of what Aristotle meant by an oligarchy. As Bartels notes, however, "if nosotros insist on flattering ourselves by referring to it as a democracy, we should be articulate that information technology is a starkly 'diff democracy'." ...more than

May 22, 2010 rmn rated information technology liked information technology

This is political scientist Larry Bartels' statistical look at the growing income inequality in America and the effects income has on American politics (and vice versa). He uses data and regression analysis to bear witness that income inequality grows during Republican presidencies and rich people have more than influence on how representatives vote. Wow, actually Helm Obvious? It took you lot six years and 300 pages to figure that out? Information technology is rumored that in his next volume, Bartels volition apply deep statistical anal This is political scientist Larry Bartels' statistical look at the growing income inequality in America and the effects income has on American politics (and vice versa). He uses data and regression assay to show that income inequality grows during Republican presidencies and rich people have more influence on how representatives vote. Wow, really Captain Obvious? It took y'all six years and 300 pages to figure that out? It is rumored that in his next book, Bartels will utilise deep statistical assay to prove that the sun rises in the morning and fat people eat more than than skinny people.

In all seriousness, while some of the results are obvious, the statistics behind them are interesting besides as some of the factors leading to those results. Nearly interestingly, Bartels does his best to approach the data and results in a non-biased and factual style. He claims non to have voted in an election since 1984 when he voted for Reagan, so he's not a left wing nut, though his findings in the book have conspicuously swung his political views to the left.

In the end, one is left wondering why anyone would ever vote Republican if economics are their main business concern since all levels of income earners exercise better under Democratic presidents and six of the last seven recessions have happened nether Republican presidents. Bartels attempts to prove why these seemingly nonsensical and non-constituent maximizing political results happen by highlighting the furnishings of information asymmetry, economic standing, brusk sightedness of voters, and political party line voting. He examines seemingly incongruous results through real world data and examples such as the minimum wage and manor tax.

Independents and Republicans should read this book as information technology is not a polemic and is as reasoned equally a conclusion making political book can exist. Data doesn't prevarication, nor practise statistics, despite what Mark Twain opined.

...more

May 05, 2012 Shel Schipper rated it really liked it

Bang-up glimpse at the quandary that extreme capitalism brings to the democratic procedure. T Equally the author wrote, "...scientists since Aristotle have wrestled with the question of whether substantial economic inequality is compatible with democracy..." Bartels fills his book with facts, statistics, charts all enumerating the unparalleled economic disparity of modern America and goes on to show studies that await at the psychology of why more people aren't upward in arms at this fact.This is a fascinatin Great glimpse at the quandary that extreme capitalism brings to the democratic procedure. T Equally the author wrote, "...scientists since Aristotle have wrestled with the question of whether substantial economic inequality is uniform with democracy..." Bartels fills his book with facts, statistics, charts all enumerating the unparalleled economic disparity of modern America and goes on to show studies that await at the psychology of why more than people aren't upwardly in arms at this fact.This is a fascinating book that should compel more of us to be outraged and to show information technology in the voting booths.

Interesting quotes:
"Meanwhile, the political procedure has evolved in ways that seem likely to reinforce the advantages of wealth. Political campaigns accept become dramatically more expensive since the 1950's, increasing the reliance of elected officials on people who tin beget to assist finance their bids for reelection. Lobbying activities by corporations and business and professional organizations have accelerated profoundly, outpacing the growth of public involvement groups.Membership in labor unions have declined substantially, eroding the primary mechanism for organized representation of working people in the governmental procedure."

"The existent value of the minimum wage has declined by more than 40% since the late 1960's, despite remarkably strong and consistent public support for minimum wage increases."

"For example, while the real income of taxpayers at the 99th percentile doubled between 1981 and 2005, the real income of taxpayers at the 99.9th percentile near tripled, and the real income of taxpayers at the 99.99th percentile - a hyper-rich stratum comprising of nigh 13,000 taxpayers - increased fivefold."

"In 2005, the New York Times published a xx-yr retrospective on the list of the 400 wealthiest Americans produced annually by Forbes magazine. The Times noted that the average internet worth of these 400 economic luminaries increased more than fourfold over that menstruation (from $600 million in 1985 to $two.81 billion in 2005) and that their combined cyberspace wealth in 2005 exceeded the gross domestic product of Canada. The median household income of Americans has been stuck at around $44,000 for five years at present. The poverty rate is up.Members of the Forbes 400, meanwhile, are richer than Croesus and every hr are getting richer."

"Although it is common for Americans to suppose that the nation's collective wealth makes fifty-fifty poor people ameliorate off than they otherwise would be, the reality is that poor people in America seem to exist distinctly less well off than poor people in countries that are less wealthy merely less unequal. A careful comparing of the living standards of poor children in thirteen rich democracies in the 1990's found the U.s. ranking next to concluding......worry that inequality itself may take deleterious social implications in the realms of family and community life, wellness and instruction."

"Middle-form America didn't sally by blow. Information technology was created past what has been called the Bang-up Pinch of incomes that took place during World Wat Ii and sustained for a generation past social norms that favored equality, strong labor unions, and progressive revenue enhancement. Since the 1970's, all of those sustaining forces take lost their power. Since 1980 in particular, U.S.government policies have consistently favored the wealthy at the expense of working families - and under the current (George W. Bush) administration, that favoritism has become extreme and relentless. From tax cuts that favor the rich to bankruptcy 'reform' that punishes the unlucky, nearly every domestic policy seems intended to accelerate our march back to the robber baron era."

and with an election coming up, hither'south food for thought:

"On average, the existent incomes of eye-course families have grown twice equally fast under Democrats as they take under Republicans, while the real incomes of working poor families take grown half dozen times as fast under Democrats as they accept under Republicans. These substantial partisan differences persist even afterward allowing for differences in economic circumstances and historical trends beyond the control of private presidents. They advise that escalating inequality is not simply an inevitable economic trend - and that a cracking deal of economic inequality in the contemporary United States is specifically attributable to the policies and priorities of Republican presidents."

...more than

Sep 12, 2008 David rated information technology it was amazing

If you want to understand why we accept then much econ disparity in this country this is a must read.

May 21, 2013 Sean Chick rated information technology actually liked it

Well written for this kind of work. The strictly empirical basis of Bartels' statement makes information technology all the more convincing. Well written for this kind of work. The strictly empirical basis of Bartels' argument makes it all the more than convincing. ...more

April 09, 2018 Doctor Moss rated it it was amazing

An middle-opening book. Bartels makes 2 major points:

- Partisan politics make a significant difference in income growth and income distribution. This is reverse to economic reductionism and some popular belief, i.e., that the economy volition do what it does regardless of who we elect as president. The story is not expert for Republicans and conservatives, but this is not an ideological argument -- it's statistical assay.

- There is no statistical prove to claim that elected representatives (Democr

An eye-opening book. Bartels makes 2 major points:

- Partisan politics make a significant difference in income growth and income distribution. This is contrary to economic reductionism and some pop belief, i.eastward., that the economy volition exercise what it does regardless of who we elect as president. The story is not adept for Republicans and conservatives, merely this is not an ideological argument -- it's statistical analysis.

- There is no statistical evidence to claim that elected representatives (Democratic or Republican) pay whatsoever directly attention to the views of the lower 3rd of income earners in their constituencies. That lower third shares a consistently diminishing portion of income growth and has no discernible share in political decisions made past their elected representatives (in Congress).

Along the way, Bartels offers an alternative answer to the "What'southward the Affair with Kansas?" question -- Thomas Frank'southward book -- why voters (at to the lowest degree before the last election) vote for Republican candidates who do not appear to represent their best economic interests. Franks had said that, with those voters, "cultural value" problems (abortion, schoolhouse prayer, etc.) had over-ridden economic interests. Bartels, once more through statistical assay, finds that those voters are actually voting their economic interests, but through a "myopic" lens -- voters' behaviors reflect election year economic functioning to the exclusion of other years. Republican presidential candidates do good from disproportionate economic growth during election years, while not paying the toll of low or even negative growth and increasing inequality over the full course of their administrations. Democrats, despite producing college overall income growth across all income segments and lower inequality, suffer from relatively poor growth during ballot years.

...more

Apr 23, 2020 Jonathan rated information technology really liked it

Has the rightward shift of US politics over the last few decades been a issue of a rightward shift of public opinion? Non and then fast, argues Larry Bartels in "Unequal Democracy." He explains how an egalitarian impulse is still quite strong in the US public according to survey data, only it hits up confronting two dynamics: (1) the fact that voters are a bundle of contradictions who ofttimes don't sympathize the implications of policy (whether rational implications get trumped by self-involvement, political party loyal Has the rightward shift of United states politics over the last few decades been a consequence of a rightward shift of public stance? Non so fast, argues Larry Bartels in "Unequal Democracy." He explains how an egalitarian impulse is still quite strong in the Usa public according to survey data, but it hits upwards confronting two dynamics: (1) the fact that voters are a bundle of contradictions who oft don't understand the implications of policy (whether rational implications go trumped by self-interest, party loyalty, or whatsoever else) and (2) the public opinion of low-income voters has no discernible impact at all on policymaking. The book paints a rather grim picture of the U.s. political scene, and whereas it's difficult to disagree on many points, I couldn't help thinking that his political analysis erases virtually all possible infinite for political agency. If politics is almost entirely sets of competing, unresponsive elites, and so what role, if whatsoever, tin can collective action play? ...more than

May 07, 2018 Wendy rated it really liked it

I really liked this volume, but it is NOT for the innumerate, among whom I now observe I accept to count (haha) myself.

For a class. Okay, as far as that goes.

December 28, 2016 Greg rated it it was astonishing

Dr. Bartels' central concern in this book is to both demonstrate how dramatically unequal the United states has go AND why it is that so relatively few people -- despite sharing moderate to progressive views on almost social, political and economic issues -- have repeatedly voted in ways that marshal with their sentiments.

Since the degree of inequality is well discussed elsewhere -- and should, for most of us, be part of our "facts on file" in the first place -- I share with you my increased une

Dr. Bartels' key concern in this volume is to both demonstrate how dramatically unequal the U.s.a. has become AND why it is that then relatively few people -- despite sharing moderate to progressive views on most social, political and economic bug -- take repeatedly voted in ways that align with their sentiments.

Since the degree of inequality is well discussed elsewhere -- and should, for most of u.s.a., be function of our "facts on file" in the first place -- I share with you my increased uneasiness over "democracy" as a consequence of reading this book.

For, in fact, the boilerplate person'southward true "state of knowledge" nigh the economic system, politics, or even as to which party has most benefited persons like themselves over short and long periods of fourth dimension IS ABYSMAL!

"We the people" are remarkably uninformed, easily misled, our vision and imagination severely curtailed past ideological blinders, and woefully ignorant of history, fifty-fifty of recent history.

Bartel gives u.s.a. ample graphs and charts that testify u.s.a. the discontinuity betwixt what people say they believe in, and how they actually limited themselves on policy questions and how they vote.

It suggests to me that, Fifty-fifty IF were were successful in bottling upward the gross flood of money from the wealthy elite, and in curbing partisan redistricting, and in replacing a thrust to heighten voting rights rather than spreading efforts to adjourn them, and in eliminating the insidious effect of "false news" and the spreaders of deliberate misinformation, we would still face up the overwhelming challenge of bringing our fellow men and women up to speed.

And just how could/would we exercise that? What are essential, objective facts as opposed to subjective judgments or mistruths? And how practice we become people talking to each other over again with resorting to ideological fortresses?

The caste of our Democracy's weakness is actually remarkable. While this book may likely not provide you with answers as to "what to practise" about the present dismal state of affairs, it will profoundly inform yous as to why we struggle so to advance in a climate permeated with ignorance and non-truth.

Recommended!

...more

Larry Bartels' "Unequal Democracy" is an exemplary work of accessible and relevant political science, which unfortunately has get and so rare theses days, particularly in the subfield of American politics. While not necessarily advancing a novel thesis, or being the kickoff to investigate the question of the effects of economic inequality on American republic, Bartels uses a wealth of mostly survey data, statistical analysis, and case studies to provide a comprehensive answer to the question. As i Larry Bartels' "Unequal Commonwealth" is an exemplary work of accessible and relevant political scientific discipline, which unfortunately has become so rare theses days, particularly in the subfield of American politics. While not necessarily advancing a novel thesis, or being the showtime to investigate the question of the effects of economic inequality on American democracy, Bartels uses a wealth of mostly survey data, statistical assay, and case studies to provide a comprehensive answer to the question. Every bit chiefly, he is able to present all his analyses in a manner that is accessible to not-experts and non-political scientists. Probably the well-nigh original and surprising conclusion is his reformulation of Thomas Frank's highly popular "What's the Matter with Kansas" thesis of 'simulated consciousness.' Unfortunately, nigh media still present Frank's thesis rather than Bartels' thesis.

This is a volume virtually American politics, not political methodology or abstruse theoretical models with footling existent-world relevance. I wish information technology would be taught as a prime instance of political science inquiry, together with books like "United states Against Them" by Kinder and Kam, rather than the ofttimes trivial and unreadable periodical manufactures that dominate graduate courses in (American) political science.

...more than

Sep 21, 2009 Dwight rated information technology liked it

An excellent and maddening book virtually the political and economic inequality that exists in the US. It takes on Thomas Frank's contention--in What's the Matter With Kansas?--that people are but stupidly voting confronting their own interests. Information technology's non that people are stupid, it'southward that our entire political system is geared not only to go people to vote against their ain interests, only also to favor the rich and their interests in a higher place all others. I'd exist curious to meet a future edition of this volume aft An excellent and maddening volume about the political and economic inequality that exists in the The states. Information technology takes on Thomas Frank's contention--in What's the Affair With Kansas?--that people are just stupidly voting against their ain interests. It's not that people are stupid, it'south that our unabridged political arrangement is geared not only to get people to vote against their own interests, but too to favor the rich and their interests above all others. I'd exist curious to come across a future edition of this volume after the economy has rebounded from its current downturn, and the aftermath of various economic policies and the influence of the and then-called Tea Political party movement tin can be evaluated. Will we have made some progress, or volition it take been more of the aforementioned? ...more

April 17, 2012 Tahir rated information technology liked it

Quick summary: Sound argument against the Thomas Frank position on the Republican drift of working class (bottom third for Bartels) voters against their economic interests. Such voters are shown to be not change significantly their economic and social upshot preferences. Only more importantly, Bartels provides useful analyses on the lack of any responsiveness of either party to the preferences of the voters in the bottom third of income, with some event past eye income voters, merely largely effect Quick summary: Sound statement against the Thomas Frank position on the Republican drift of working form (bottom 3rd for Bartels) voters against their economic interests. Such voters are shown to be not change significantly their economic and social issue preferences. But more chiefly, Bartels provides useful analyses on the lack of whatever responsiveness of either political party to the preferences of the voters in the bottom third of income, with some effect by middle income voters, simply largely effected by the top income. Such a conclusion would seem to dovetail well with the investment theory of political parties from Ferguson and Rogers. ...more

Mar 22, 2013 Sylvia rated it information technology was ok

The statistics are very, very useful. The conclusions are absurd and the explanations are generally sought in the contrary direction from where the answers lie. But perchance it was the best way to successfully promote the publication to a broader audience.
It would not be on Obama's reading list if it lacked the convenient determination. It contains some uncanny truths with a thin layer of - for relevant people acceptable - speculations on how to interpret the information, wrapped effectually it.
2 stars for provid The statistics are very, very useful. The conclusions are absurd and the explanations are mostly sought in the opposite direction from where the answers prevarication. But perchance it was the best way to successfully promote the publication to a broader audience.
It would not be on Obama's reading listing if information technology lacked the convenient conclusion. Information technology contains some uncanny truths with a thin layer of - for relevant people adequate - speculations on how to interpret the data, wrapped effectually it.
2 stars for providing others with some empirical evidence to back up their more sensible claims most the fallacy of commonwealth in The states. ...more

A rather expert examination of the political aspects of economical inequality in the gimmicky Us. The writer pretty conclusively demonstrates that the U.s.a. political system but ignores the policy preferences of low-income individuals. This has created a feed-back loop wherein economic reward leads to and reinforces political advantage and vice versa. It should come every bit no surprise, then, that economic inequality has reached heights not seen since the Gilt Historic period.

Takeaway lesson? Do

A rather good examination of the political aspects of economic inequality in the contemporary United states. The author pretty conclusively demonstrates that the U.s. political system only ignores the policy preferences of low-income individuals. This has created a feed-back loop wherein economic advantage leads to and reinforces political advantage and vice versa. It should come up as no surprise, and then, that economic inequality has reached heights not seen since the Aureate Age.

Takeaway lesson? Don't be poor. If yous are, look the organization to continuously screw you over.

...more

The author utilizes his analysis of existing surveys to dehumanize the disquisitional state of affairs the nation faces with a worsening inequality in the distribution of wealth. The concluding fleeting references to the devastation of Katrina cannot save this work. It is a purely bookish exercise that does footling except to substantiate what should be obvious while failing to offer any solutions or proposals to restore greater residuum. This was a very tedious read.

Apr xviii, 2008 Bimus rated it it was amazing

Recommends it for: America

Recommended to Bimus past: Paul Krugman

Incredible measurement of political economic consciousness over the last 40 or and so years. Exist prepared to know a piffling nearly statistics if you lot want to truly understand what the dynamics are. At that place are apparently language bolts of lightning explaining some of the comparisons though. I suppose it would be nigh revolutionary in the proof information technology provides merely in some sense we already knew this? Y'all tell me.

This is the most data-filled, research-stocked compilation that honestly and provocatively exposes devestatingly necessary reality. It'southward a very tough read but rewarding. I recommend information technology to anyone who doesn't understand the powerful relationship between american political parties and their direct influence of economical policy.
This is the about data-filled, enquiry-stocked compilation that honestly and provocatively exposes devestatingly necessary reality. It's a very tough read simply rewarding. I recommend it to anyone who doesn't understand the powerful relationship between american political parties and their straight influence of economic policy.
...more

Feb 22, 2009 Jonathan rated it really liked information technology

Fantastic statistical look on how presidential administrations affect the economy, with an emphasis on the effect it has on people of different income levels. It helps to be a little familiar with statistics to become everything he lays out, just he's done a decent job of making nearly of it accessible to the layman. No need to believe the spin from either side anymore - only look at the data. Fantastic statistical look on how presidential administrations affect the economy, with an emphasis on the effect it has on people of unlike income levels. It helps to be a little familiar with statistics to get everything he lays out, merely he's done a decent chore of making most of it accessible to the layman. No need to believe the spin from either side anymore - only look at the data. ...more

Apr 22, 2011 Tamra rated information technology liked information technology

Economic science analysis that large disparities in income and wealth do not promote economic growth. Compares our stats to that of other countries, and we come short in economical mobility and living standards for poor children. Book explains how we got where nosotros are today. Wondering how we are so broke today as a nation? Read this book and yous'll become a clear movie. Economics analysis that big disparities in income and wealth do non promote economical growth. Compares our stats to that of other countries, and nosotros come up up short in economic mobility and living standards for poor children. Book explains how we got where we are today. Wondering how we are and so broke today as a nation? Read this book and you'll get a clear pic. ...more than

Oct 02, 2012 Michael Quinn rated it it was amazing

Cipher short of a masterpiece. A damning business relationship of the politics of inequality and the forces that have separated the rich from the rest for the last xxx years. At that place tin be little doubt virtually the huge role that government plays in this process. Each section is nifty, but Bartles saves the all-time for the final affiliate, which is heart wrenching.

The book is a groovy statistical exploration of American public stance focusing on economic inequality. The author'southward analyses refutes some commonly held assumptions regarding political opinions. However, argumentation was weak with respect to opinion formation and the apparent need to reaffirm his commitment to egalitarianism at various points throughout the book was grating. The book is a dandy statistical exploration of American public opinion focusing on economical inequality. The writer'south analyses refutes some commonly held assumptions regarding political opinions. However, argumentation was weak with respect to stance formation and the apparent need to reaffirm his commitment to egalitarianism at various points throughout the book was grating. ...more than

Apr 20, 2008 Jonathan rated it really liked it

Bartels sets out to write a book that appeals to both policy wonks and a general audience, and I'd say it succeeds. It is laden with statistics and data but yet quite readable. It is likewise quite sobering to anyone who cares most social justice and income inequality. Bartels sets out to write a book that appeals to both policy wonks and a general audience, and I'd say it succeeds. It is laden with statistics and data but still quite readable. It is also quite sobering to anyone who cares about social justice and income inequality. ...more

December xi, 2008 John rated it it was amazing

Great test of inequality & american democracy. Attainable to advanced undergrads, but be prepared to provide explanations on bones stats. Most statistical models are quite simple, but presents plenty testify to get you thinking & posing questions.

Really good work for policy wonks. Tons of stats that evidence how piffling the separate is in America's political views... yet also showing how that narrow political divide is exploited by the top income brackets. Really skillful piece of work for policy wonks. Tons of stats that bear witness how picayune the dissever is in America'due south political views... still also showing how that narrow political divide is exploited past the top income brackets. ...more than

Jul ten, 2013 C. Scott rated it it was ok

Stuffed with deep analysis of intriguing studies... but a very trying read. Unless you're cool with reading charts - then reading detailed descriptions of said charts, this scholarly piece of work will be hard to piece of work your fashion through. Stuffed with deep analysis of intriguing studies... but a very trying read. Unless you lot're absurd with reading charts - then reading detailed descriptions of said charts, this scholarly work will exist hard to work your way through. ...more

Data assay is interesting and comprehensive, leading to some surprising conclusions about the extent of political inequality and the role of partisan politics. This volume was written in 2008, but still relevant now, especially post-2016 ballot.

October 24, 2021 Fellipe rated it actually liked it

Social science done right. A bang-up mix of quantitative and qualitative inquiry to bear witness how suspicions of diff representation in the U.s. have statistical backing. Merely it is not an easy read for those who are not in academia.

May 08, 2008 Chris rated it it was amazing

Thoughtful, careful handling of the causes of inequality in America. Yous should read information technology, but in case you lot don't, I'll cut to the hunt: The Republicans did it. Thoughtful, careful treatment of the causes of inequality in America. You should read it, but in example you don't, I'll cut to the chase: The Republicans did it. ...more

Nov 01, 2008 Ray rated it liked it

Recommends information technology for: academics

great research. potent indictment against GOP for hurting practically everyone but the very rich. But how exercise they keep winning if this is true? His answer is not very compelling.

Larry Bartels is an American political scientist.

He holds the May Werthan Shayne Chair of Public Policy and Social Science at Vanderbilt Academy.

His scholarship focuses on public opinion, campaigns and elections, representation, and public policy.

In addition to his books, he is also the author of numerous scholarly articles and of occasional pieces in the New York Times, Washington Post, Los A

Larry Bartels is an American political scientist.

He holds the May Werthan Shayne Chair of Public Policy and Social Science at Vanderbilt Academy.

His scholarship focuses on public opinion, campaigns and elections, representation, and public policy.

In improver to his books, he is also the writer of numerous scholarly articles and of occasional pieces in the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and other outlets.

...more

News & Interviews

If you're seeking an excellent audiobook, you cannot go incorrect with an laurels-winning recording. Luckily for us, each yr the Audie Awards option...

"On average, the existent incomes of middle-class families take grown twice equally fast under Democrats as they have under Republicans, while the real incomes of working poor families take grown six times as fast under Democrats every bit they take under Republicans. These substantial partisan differences persist even later assuasive for differences in economic circumstances and historical trends beyond the control of individual presidents. They advise that escalating inequality is not simply an inevitable economic tendency—and that a neat bargain of economic inequality in the contemporary United States is specifically attributable to the policies and priorities of Republican presidents." — 1 likes

"as the economically advantaged groups unleash their greater resources in the political sphere. These groups vestibule for revenue enhancement loopholes, hire lawyers and accountants to maximize their benefit from tax laws, and then deduct the costs." — 1 likes

More quotes…

Welcome back. Only a moment while nosotros sign you in to your Goodreads account.

nelsonmillue73.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2705879-unequal-democracy

Share this post